Metro comparison
Austin vs Seattle
Compare Austin, Texas and Seattle, Washington using raw sourced indicators for industrial electricity price, state tax competitiveness and unemployment context.
Data updated:
Geography: CBSA (metropolitan statistical area), OMB Bulletin 23-01 (July 2023) — never city limits.
Both metros are compared on identical raw indicators: Austin-Round Rock-San Marcos, TX Metro Area (CBSA 12420) and Seattle-Tacoma-Bellevue, WA Metro Area (CBSA 42660).
Side-by-side indicators
Published Values
| Indicator | Austin | Seattle | Unit | Geography level | Source | Vintage |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Average industrial retail electricity priceAverage price of electricity to ultimate industrial customers by state. U.S. average reference value: 8.13 cents/kWh. | 6.12 cents/kWh | 6.61 cents/kWh | cents/kWh | State (principal state of the CBSA) | U.S. Energy Information Administration, Electric Power Annual, Table 2.10 | Year 2024 final |
| State Tax Competitiveness Index overall rankRank 1 is the most competitive state tax structure; rank 50 is the least competitive. | 7 of 50 | 45 of 50 | rank of 50 | State (principal state of the CBSA) | Tax Foundation, 2026 State Tax Competitiveness Index | 2026 edition; tax systems as of July 1, 2025 |
| Unemployment rate, July 2026pA low unemployment rate indicates a tight labor market, which can make hiring harder. It is shown for context, not ranked. | 4% | 5% | % | CBSA | U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Local Area Unemployment Statistics, Metropolitan Area Employment and Unemployment news release, Table 1 | July 2026 preliminary (p); released September 2, 2026 |
| Unemployment rate, July 2025A low unemployment rate indicates a tight labor market, which can make hiring harder. It is shown for context, not ranked. | 3.6% | 4.6% | % | CBSA | U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Local Area Unemployment Statistics, Metropolitan Area Employment and Unemployment news release, Table 1 | July 2025; released September 2, 2026 |
No directional claim or composite output is inferred from these values. Composite calculations are not published. Figures shown are taken directly from the cited sources without adjustment.
Location
Power & energy
Power Cost, Reliability and Interconnection
Power is the binding constraint on most large industrial and data center projects. Each indicator below is shown with its publishing organization, dataset and vintage. Reliability is reported both with and without major event days, because storm-driven outages and day-to-day reliability are different questions for a site decision.
Austin — Texas
| Indicator | Value | Vintage | Source |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average industrial retail electricity priceTexas state average, industrial customer class | 6.12 cents/kWh | Year 2024 final | U.S. Energy Information Administration, Electric Power Annual, Table 2.10 (State, using the metro's first principal city state, Annual) |
| SAIDI, with major event daysMinutes of interruption per customer per year | Not available | Pending ingestion of Form EIA-861 reliability tables | U.S. Energy Information Administration, Form EIA-861 reliability data, via Electric Power Annual (State, using the metro's first principal city state, Annual (published each October)) |
| SAIDI, without major event days | Not available | Pending ingestion of Form EIA-861 reliability tables | U.S. Energy Information Administration, Form EIA-861 reliability data, via Electric Power Annual (State, using the metro's first principal city state, Annual (published each October)) |
| SAIFI, with major event daysInterruptions per customer per year | Not available | Pending ingestion of Form EIA-861 reliability tables | U.S. Energy Information Administration, Form EIA-861 reliability data, via Electric Power Annual (State, using the metro's first principal city state, Annual (published each October)) |
| SAIFI, without major event days | Not available | Pending ingestion of Form EIA-861 reliability tables | U.S. Energy Information Administration, Form EIA-861 reliability data, via Electric Power Annual (State, using the metro's first principal city state, Annual (published each October)) |
| RTO/ISO or balancing authorityRTO/ISO | ERCOT | ||
| Serving utility or utilitiesConsult each utility for its large-load and economic development tariffs |
| ||
Price and reliability indicators are state-level series using Texas, the state of the metro's first principal city; EIA does not publish them at metropolitan statistical area level. Serving utilities and market footprint are specific to the Austin metro. Indicators reading "Not available" have not yet been ingested from the registered source and are never estimated.
Seattle — Washington
| Indicator | Value | Vintage | Source |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average industrial retail electricity priceWashington state average, industrial customer class | 6.61 cents/kWh | Year 2024 final | U.S. Energy Information Administration, Electric Power Annual, Table 2.10 (State, using the metro's first principal city state, Annual) |
| SAIDI, with major event daysMinutes of interruption per customer per year | Not available | Pending ingestion of Form EIA-861 reliability tables | U.S. Energy Information Administration, Form EIA-861 reliability data, via Electric Power Annual (State, using the metro's first principal city state, Annual (published each October)) |
| SAIDI, without major event days | Not available | Pending ingestion of Form EIA-861 reliability tables | U.S. Energy Information Administration, Form EIA-861 reliability data, via Electric Power Annual (State, using the metro's first principal city state, Annual (published each October)) |
| SAIFI, with major event daysInterruptions per customer per year | Not available | Pending ingestion of Form EIA-861 reliability tables | U.S. Energy Information Administration, Form EIA-861 reliability data, via Electric Power Annual (State, using the metro's first principal city state, Annual (published each October)) |
| SAIFI, without major event days | Not available | Pending ingestion of Form EIA-861 reliability tables | U.S. Energy Information Administration, Form EIA-861 reliability data, via Electric Power Annual (State, using the metro's first principal city state, Annual (published each October)) |
| RTO/ISO or balancing authorityBalancing authority (no organized market) | Bonneville Power Administration and Puget Sound Energy balancing authorities | ||
| Serving utility or utilitiesConsult each utility for its large-load and economic development tariffs |
| ||
Price and reliability indicators are state-level series using Washington, the state of the metro's first principal city; EIA does not publish them at metropolitan statistical area level. Serving utilities and market footprint are specific to the Seattle metro. Indicators reading "Not available" have not yet been ingested from the registered source and are never estimated.
Generation queue is not load interconnection
Generation interconnection and load interconnection are different processes. Berkeley Lab's Queued Up data tracks power plants seeking to connect to the transmission grid — as of the end of 2025, over 2,060 GW were active in those queues, and the median project built in 2025 took more than five years from request to commercial operation. A manufacturing plant or data center instead needs a load connection, governed by the serving utility's tariff and interconnection process. Timelines for load connections are not captured in the queue data and must be confirmed with the utility directly.
Queue figures: Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Queued Up, 2026 edition (Generator interconnection queue capacity and duration, through year-end 2025).
Category publication status
Six-Category Framework
| Category | Weight | Loaded indicators | Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Workforce & Talent Pipeline | 24% | 0 of 2 | Indicators not yet published. 0 evaluative indicators loaded; 3 are required before any category calculation is considered. 2 context indicators shown but not used directionally.Only unemployment context is currently loaded. Category calculations are not published from context-only values. |
| Power & Energy | 20% | 0 of 0 | Indicators not yet publishedSAIDI and SAIFI are registered but not loaded; utility load-interconnection timelines are not published in a comparable metro series. |
| Site Readiness & Land | 17% | 0 of 0 | Indicators not yet publishedRequires certified-site inventories, parcel-level contiguous acreage and current zoning classifications held by state and local jurisdictions in incompatible formats. |
| Speed & Governance | 15% | 0 of 0 | Indicators not yet publishedRequires measured permitting cycle times and approval outcomes by jurisdiction. No audited comparable series covers the metros in this set. |
| Operating Cost Structure | 16% | 2 of 2 | Indicators not yet published. 2 evaluative indicators loaded; 3 are required before any category calculation is considered.Industrial electricity price and state tax rank are loaded. Occupancy cost remains unavailable until comparable CBRE or JLL quarterly asking-rent values are available for all 24 metros. |
| Logistics & Market Access | 8% | 0 of 0 | Indicators not yet publishedNo logistics values are loaded. Freight, rail, air-service and market-access indicators remain unpublished until comparable source data is added. |
Composite calculations are not published. Current pages show raw source indicators only, with missing values left as not available.
Questions
Frequently Asked Questions
- What does this Austin vs Seattle comparison show?
- It compares the raw published indicators currently loaded for Austin-Round Rock-San Marcos, TX Metro Area and Seattle-Tacoma-Bellevue, WA Metro Area. Composite calculations and directional verdicts are not published.
- How do Austin and Seattle compare on industrial electricity price?
- Austin shows 6.12 cents/kWh; Seattle shows 6.61 cents/kWh. The figure is a state industrial average from the cited EIA table, not a negotiated large-load tariff.
- How do Austin and Seattle compare on state tax competitiveness?
- Austin uses 7 of 50; Seattle uses 45 of 50. Rank 1 is the most competitive state tax system and rank 50 is the least competitive.
- How should unemployment be read for Austin and Seattle?
- A low unemployment rate indicates a tight labor market, which can make hiring harder. It is shown for context, not ranked.
- Are these metros ordered against each other?
- No. Austin has 4 loaded raw indicators and Seattle has 4. The page does not declare one metro ahead or publish an aggregate result.
Related ranking topics
| Topic | Status |
|---|---|
| Best Cities for Tech Companies | Underlying data only |
| Best Cities for Startups | Underlying data only |
| Best Cities for Corporate Headquarters | Underlying data only |
| Best Cities for Manufacturing | Underlying data only |
Other comparisons
| Metro pair | Status |
|---|---|
| Austin vs Boston | Raw indicators only |
| Austin vs Dallas | Raw indicators only |
| Boston vs Seattle | Raw indicators only |
Data provenance
Indicator Sources and Category Weights
Categories and weights follow the Area Development survey. Displayed values come from the cited indicator registry and are not converted into scores.
Workforce & Talent Pipeline
Weight 24%2 loaded indicator definitionsAvailability of skilled labor and the depth of the technical talent pipeline feeding it, including quality-of-life conditions that affect retention.
Survey factors represented
- Skilled labor availability (100%)
- Technical talent pipeline depth (95.5%)
- Quality of life / retention context (no published percentage in the current source)
Area Development, 40th Annual Corporate and 22nd Annual Consultant Site Selection Survey, Q1 2026.
| Indicator | Subfactor | Source organization | Dataset | Vintage | Geography |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unemployment rate, July 2026p | Labor-market tightness context; not used directionally | U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics | Local Area Unemployment Statistics, Metropolitan Area Employment and Unemployment news release, Table 1 | July 2026 preliminary; released September 2, 2026 | CBSA |
| Unemployment rate, July 2025 | Labor-market tightness context; not used directionally | U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics | Local Area Unemployment Statistics, Metropolitan Area Employment and Unemployment news release, Table 1 | July 2025; released September 2, 2026 | CBSA |
Power & Energy
Weight 20%0 loaded indicator definitionsAvailability of electric power at the load levels large facilities request, the transmission and substation capacity serving candidate sites, and delivered grid reliability.
Survey factors represented
- Power availability at scale (98.5%)
- Transmission and substation capacity (97%)
- Grid reliability (92.5%)
Area Development, 40th Annual Corporate and 22nd Annual Consultant Site Selection Survey, Q1 2026.
Indicators not yet publishedSAIDI and SAIFI are registered but not loaded; utility load-interconnection timelines are not published in a comparable metro series.
Site Readiness & Land
Weight 17%0 loaded indicator definitionsWhether shovel-ready sites exist in the market: completed due diligence, contiguous developable acreage and zoning that already permits the intended use.
Survey factors represented
- Site readiness and due diligence (98.5%)
- Contiguous developable acreage (92.5%)
- Zoning compatibility (no published percentage in the current source)
- Environmental and land-use risk (no published percentage in the current source)
Area Development, 40th Annual Corporate and 22nd Annual Consultant Site Selection Survey, Q1 2026.
Indicators not yet publishedRequires certified-site inventories, parcel-level contiguous acreage and current zoning classifications held by state and local jurisdictions in incompatible formats.
Speed & Governance
Weight 15%0 loaded indicator definitionsHow predictably a project moves through approvals: responsiveness of state and local government, certainty of permitting timelines, and political and regulatory stability.
Survey factors represented
- Responsive state and local government (97%)
- Certainty of permitting (94%)
- Political and regulatory stability (94%)
Area Development, 40th Annual Corporate and 22nd Annual Consultant Site Selection Survey, Q1 2026.
Indicators not yet publishedRequires measured permitting cycle times and approval outcomes by jurisdiction. No audited comparable series covers the metros in this set.
Operating Cost Structure
Weight 16%2 loaded indicator definitionsRecurring cost of operating a facility in the metro: tax structure, labor cost, occupancy cost and energy cost.
Survey factors represented
- Operating cost structure (tax, labor, occupancy, energy) (97%)
Area Development, 40th Annual Corporate and 22nd Annual Consultant Site Selection Survey, Q1 2026.
| Indicator | Subfactor | Source organization | Dataset | Vintage | Geography |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Average industrial retail electricity price | Energy cost | U.S. Energy Information Administration | Electric Power Annual, Table 2.10 | Year 2024 final | State, using the metro's first principal city state |
| State Tax Competitiveness Index overall rank | Tax structure | Tax Foundation | 2026 State Tax Competitiveness Index | 2026 edition; reflects tax systems as of July 1, 2025 | State, using the metro's first principal city state |
Logistics & Market Access
Weight 8%0 loaded indicator definitionsInbound and outbound movement of goods and people: highway and freight capacity, rail and intermodal access, air service and reach to customer markets.
Survey factors represented
- Highway and freight access (no published percentage in the current source)
- Proximity to major customer markets (no published percentage in the current source)
- Rail, intermodal and air service (no published percentage in the current source)
Area Development, 40th Annual Corporate and 22nd Annual Consultant Site Selection Survey, Q1 2026.
Indicators not yet publishedNo logistics values are loaded. Freight, rail, air-service and market-access indicators remain unpublished until comparable source data is added.
Sources used on this page
- U.S. Energy Information Administration. Electric Power Annual, Table 2.10, Year 2024 final.
- Tax Foundation. 2026 State Tax Competitiveness Index, 2026 edition (tax systems as of July 1, 2025).
- U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics. Local Area Unemployment Statistics, Metropolitan Area Employment and Unemployment news release, Table 1, Released September 2, 2026; July 2026 preliminary and July 2025 reference months.
- U.S. Energy Information Administration. Form EIA-861 reliability data, published via Electric Power Annual, Annual, as published.
- Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory. Queued Up: Characteristics of Power Plants Seeking Transmission Interconnection, 2026 edition, 2026 edition (queue data through 31 December 2025).
- Area Development, 40th Annual Corporate and 22nd Annual Consultant Site Selection Survey, Q1 2026. Category weights only; no composite calculation is published.
Composite calculations are not published. Figures shown are taken directly from the cited sources without adjustment.
All figures are reported at the metropolitan statistical area (MSA) level as delineated by the U.S. Office of Management and Budget, not city limits. Where a series is only published at state level, that is stated in the indicator table. Full source provenance and category weights.